Register for free to upload content and post comments

A user-driven online community and resource library for ethics teachers, scholars, and practitioners worldwide.

Lawyers Clients Consider Worthless

Submitted by Clark Cunningham on Fri, 04-22-2011
Long title
Should American Law Schools Continue to Graduate Lawyers Whom Clients Consider Worthless?
Author(s)
Cunningham, Clark D.
Author(s)' contact information
W. Lee Burge Professor of Law & Ethics
Georgia State University College of Law
http://law.gsu.edu/ccunningham/
Publication
Maryland Law Review
Volume number
70
Issue number
2
Year
2011
First page number
499
Last page number
512
Country
United States
Abstract
At a recent national conference on legal education, the associate general counsel of one of America’s largest corporations said that his company no longer allows first or second year associates to work on their matters “because they’re worthless.” At one time many law schools were comfortable in relying on large firms to turn their graduates into lawyers worthy to represent clients, but the famous “Cravath” system for such training has been in decline and is now severely threatened by the current economic crisis in law practice. The article contrasts the American approach to training lawyers to that in place in other major jurisdictions related to the common law tradition, with a particular focus on Scotland. The article then concludes with an examination of a ground-breaking experiment at the University of New Hampshire Law School, where students who complete a special two year honors program designed to make them “client-ready” are being admitted to practice upon graduation without taking a conventional bar examination.
Published as part of a Symposium on The Profession and the Academy: Addressing Major Changes in Law Practice
Status
Published
Select the option that describes the rights you hold in the attached content
I do not hold complete rights to all intellectual property in the attached content, but have permission from all people or entities who do hold rights in the attached content to post it on the Forum website and to grant the license, if any, that I have chosen below.
Select a license for the attached content
"Copy": I give permission for other users to download the attached content and copy, distribute, and repost it on the web, as long as they credit the author(s) and the publication and provide relevant identifying citation information (volume, page numbers, year of publication, city of publication), do not change the work in any way, and do not use it commercially. ("Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives" Creative Commons license)
Lawyer Regulation